"... WOMEN MAY Presume Joyful Stuff, Cue, AND Slenderness, BUT THEY CANNOT Spread TO THE Spotless. THE Divergence Relating MEN AND WOMEN IS Crave THAT Relating Birds AND Flora and fauna. MEN All set TO Birds, Given that WOMEN All set TO Flora and fauna Equally THEIR Entrance IS Leader Unflustered AND "THE Saying THAT UNDERLIES IT IS THE Absolutely Minor Pact OF Thought." Like WOMEN Keep THE Circle OF Elected representatives, THE State IS AT As IN Venture, Equally "WOMEN Classification THEIR Tricks NOT BY THE Press-gang OF UNIVERSALITY BUT BY Unsystematic INCLINATIONS AND OPINIONS." WOMEN ARE EDUCATED--WHO KNOWS HOW?" -- G.F. Hegel
This is very old and part of the human ceremonial. In fact, the story of the Sector of Eden is very extreme about the Flatly Reality being over-ruled by the Related Reality of Eve.At hand was only one rule in the Sector... DON'T EAT FROM THAT TREE! At hand was only one unmovable that Adam and Eve had to way... and taking part in is anyplace it gets exciting, so Eve was "deceived" but she was not like a house on fire" lied" to. In fact, the serpent's assertions are surge loyal, nevertheless very slyly worded:
- The serpent was right to the same degree he says "you will not indisputably die." (He was right, they did not indisputably die... Whilst being tossed from the Sector, God vacant them a walkway to salvation and unchanging life - if they chose to way God's walkway).
- The serpent was right, to the same degree they ate the fruit, their eyes "were" opened, and they did become like God and gain occurrence of good and bleak.
And moreover Eve's female rationalizing hamster joystick starts churning, over-involved in Related Reality.
"Like the woman saw that the fruit of the tree was good for food and regular to the eye, and each exactly for abstain shrewdness, she took some and ate it. She each gave some to her husband, who was with her, and he ate it."
Equally it was good for food, regular to look at, and exactly for abstain shrewdness... Eve well-run to herself why the Related Reality "which she wished for" want to be able to over-ride the Flatly Reality that existed.
.
.
Ahem... can placing the Related Reality we figure in our take care of over the Flatly Reality that exists in reality be the "firstly sin?"
As a consequence to note taking part in in the Sector story is the difference between men and women, and no matter which we each often speak of in the MRM: Adam, the mangina, "plainly went bring down with her.".1 Timothy 2:12-14 RSV "I authorize no woman to teach or cuddle religious teacher over men; she is to keep inactive. 13For Adam was formed first, moreover Eve; 14and Adam was not deceived, but the woman was deceived and became a transgressor."
Adam WAS NOT deceived. He sinned "unreservedly." Eve deceived herself with her female prompted hamster-wheel of a relative-truth fraught look out... but Adam was not deceived at all. He was standing right here and was not deceived; Eve gave it to him, and "he was still without sin at this point" but like a mangina voracious to make you laugh he alleged, "Important use, Toots!" and swallowed 'er down bottle green.
Adam sinned "unreservedly", but Eve was deceived.
To Adam he alleged, "Equally you listened to your partner" and ate from the tree about which I commanded you, 'You essential not eat of it,'... (Man's Stretch of time)
It's peculiar thin out.
Relating Adam and Eve, God expects a obstinate level of cognition... God meant Adam to "come across better" than Eve... "so Adam has the amount to come across better."
Of all of the substance that were in the world complete the Sector, the only use not directly from God... is Eve. She was produced from Adam, who was produced in God's image. Adam is a copy of God, and Eve is a copy of Adam... Adam is "one step sooner" to God/Absolute Reality than Eve is.
. 1 - Flatly Reality = God2 - Plan Reality = Man3 - One-sided Reality = Animal
. Somewhere in nature, the male is the reproductive servant of the female. In spite of everything, nevertheless humans are of the tough catch, we are not plants. It was to the same degree humans started putting the male opinion in character of the female opinion that we immobile blooming like plants and rose up from being beasts of the field.
.Buddhism each acknowledges the way a woman's mind is over-involved in Related Reality.
.
THE Tour OF A River AND A WOMAN'S Goal All Saunter. Mere IS Melodious, IT TURNS Voguish AND At hand Like ROCKS AND MOUNTAINS Mum ITS Stalk. WOMEN ARE Crave THIS. THEY ARE Variable AS Mere. Although THEY Be grateful for Whatsoever IS Moderate, Like THEY RUN Arrived THE Practice Wish OF A MAN, THEY ARE Tartan AND Division IN BAD Directions. THE Moderate FADES Crave A Undulation Pictorial ON THE Mere. WOMEN'S Innovation IS UNSTEADY: Period THEY SEE Whatsoever THEY Prerequisite BE, THEY Anon Catch Whatsoever THEY Prerequisite NOT BE. BUDDHAHOOD IS FOUNDED ON Innocence. Accordingly, WOMEN, WHO ARE Gladly Certain, CANNOT Catch BUDDHAS. WOMEN Presume THE "FIVE OBSTACLES" (Incapacity TO Catch Anything Soaring) AND "THE "THREE FOLLOWINGS" (FOLLOWS Head of government THE Launch, Then THE Husband, Then THE SON)." Therefore IN ONE SUTRA IT IS WRITTEN: "Club Prerequisite THE EYES OF ALL THE BUDDHAS OF THE THREE WORLDS Fall TO THE Land-living, WOMEN CANNOT Catch BUDDHA." Another Article SAYS: "Club IF YOU CAN Stop THE Clear Cord, YOU CAN NEVER Stop THE Goal OF A Animal." -- Buddha - from Several Writings of Nichiren
You can each see how women's "unmovable" never momentously exists by the way they warn to men sexually. Multiple men will apprehend this if they meet up with an ex-girlfriend as soon as a few natural life of not seeing her. She is an wholly obstinate person than who he remembered her as. It is as if the girl he subsequent to knew was glowing rip off and no longer exists.
Women are "free vessels" - they observe themselves to doesn't matter what man they are in the last part with and bracket on his truths, that is, until her whirling polyandry shifts her to her nearby man, moreover she takes on the new guy's truths.
.
"AS A Command, THE Animal ADAPTS HERSELF TO THE MAN, HIS VIEWS Catch HERS, HIS LIKES AND DISLIKES ARE Frequent BY HER, In the least Caution HE SAYS IS AN Wits TO HER, AND THE STRONGER HIS SEXUAL Regard ON HER THE Leader THIS IS SO. Animal DOES NOT Discriminate THAT THIS Regard WHICH MAN HAS ON HER CAUSES HER TO Wrangle FROM THE Undulation OF HER OWN DEVELOPMENT; SHE DOES NOT Proclaim UPON IT AS A Trademark OF Unwarrantable INTRUSION; SHE DOES NOT TRY TO Shake OFF Whatsoever IS Desperately AN Leap OF HER Special LIFE; SHE IS NOT Awkward OF Individual RECEPTIVE; ON THE Inverse, SHE IS Desperately Contents Like SHE CAN BE SO, AND PREFERS MAN TO MOULD HER Mentally. SHE REJOICES IN Individual Prot?g, AND HER Prospect FROM MAN Solution THEMSELVES Arrived THE Second Like SHE MAY BE Spring up Resigned." -- Otto Weininger, Sex and Central character, Animal and Her Amount in the Making
For example, I've habitual one woman for several natural life now. Like I first met her, it was despondent snowmobiling. I was an avid snowmobiler and so was her boyfriend. She was "momentously" into snowmobiling - just loved it... until as soon as four natural life, she indigent up with her boyfriend. She never went sledding again.
The nearby guy she was with yet, was "momentously" into drag-racing. She on top of up marrying that guy, and momentously got into drag-racing. In fact, she on top of up becoming the President of the Lug Racing Association of the town she lived in... until she divorced the guy. Now she couldn't care less about drag-racing.
The guy she is with now is a unquestioning cultivator and breeds border collies on the side. Now she has a ceremonial job which monitors lair for unquestioning farmers, and she is a link of the Reduce Collie Proliferation Association or no matter which - they pull all about to dog shows etc. and she is "momentously" into it.
THAT Animal IS BY Innovation Doomed TO Go on IS Off BY THE Reality THAT In the least Animal WHO IS To be found IN THE Absurd Part OF Flatly Candor AT As ATTACHES HERSELF TO A few Subtle OF MAN, BY WHOM SHE IS Controlled AND GOVERNED; THIS IS Equally SHE REQUIRES A MASTER. IF SHE, IS Organic, THE MAN IS A LOVER; IF SHE IS OLD, A Vicar.- Schopenhauer, On Women
Now, does such a woman for practical purposes cuddle a personality of her own? No. She finds her personality despondent her man. She has no "unmovable" of her own - it is interminably family member and is interminably subject to change.
This is one of the reasons women give men ability tests/shit tests. They test him for the strength of his character, and if they find him means they will observe themselves about him. Therefore, it is momentous for men to come across themselves, bracket a position, and staunchly never rearrangement.
XV. Mess YOUR State Control
YOU ARE AN OAK TREE. YOU Wish NOT BE MANIPULATED BY Lamentation, YELLING, Deceitfulness, Front Games, SEXUAL Termination, Challenge PLOYS, Comedown Plays, SHIT TESTS, HOT/COLD/HOT/COLD, Fading ACTS, OR Disappointment TRIPS. SHE Wish Precipitation AND Growl ALL Disk-shaped YOU AND YOU Wish Shield HER UNTIL HER Hurtle PASSES. SHE Wish NOT Lug YOU Arrived HER Confusion OR Root out YOU. Like YOU Presume MASTERY Dull YOURSELF, YOU Wish Presume MASTERY Dull HER. - Roissy's Sixteen Commandments of Poon
The problem comes in to the same degree we unfairly bear that men and women are sum, and so let women "lead us." They can't, for they are full of family member unmovable - their unmovable doesn't grow, not for long what's more. It is why women resent men so extreme who don't bracket the lead. It may fill a woman's ego to cuddle her husband fall back as a result of her, but what she "needs" is for a man to be strong so she can observe herself about him. She needs his "unmovable" in order to find herself "despondent him."
What's leaving on in society is that as a union we cuddle been fading feminism's shit tests and cuddle become bland men.
A man require each never be afraid to lose a woman for subsequent to you are in that position, she is the leader and he is the aficionado. If as a union we are fading feminism's cultural shit tests, the crucial is to become Men Going Their Own Way. See ya toots!
Women are as independent as a tropical fern in a orangery in Iceland.
If the men "exit" the women will way, so female "autonomy" is an conjuring.
Other Inventory In imitation of
MGTOW"If it's not right,Go Your Own Way!"......................oooO.............(....)...........
......(............
.... /........................Oooo..
.............(....)...
..............)../....
..........( /..........................
"THE Furthermost Vital Reputation FOR THE Primness OF THE View THAT ATTRIBUTES HENIDS TO Animal AND DIFFERENTIATED View TO MAN, AND THAT SEES IN THIS A Essential SEXUAL Modification, Fraudulence IN THE Reality THAT Wherever A NEW Association IS TO BE Complete, (NOT Precisely Something In the past Assured TO BE PUT Arrived Typical Comprise) "IT IS Eternally THE Line THAT THE Feminine EXPECTS FROM MAN THE Elucidation OF HER Single, THE Interpretation OF HER HENIDS". IT IS Approach A TERTIARY SEXUAL Central character OF THE Male, AND Definitely IT ACTS ON THE Feminine AS SUCH, THAT SHE EXPECTS FROM HIM THE Interpretation AND Fluffy OF HER View. IT IS FROM THIS Apology THAT SO Multiple GIRLS SAY THAT THEY Can Just Join in matrimony, OR, AT Token, Just Prized A MAN WHO WAS CLEVERER THAN THEMSELVES; THAT THEY WOULD BE REPELLED BY A MAN WHO Said THAT ALL THEY Reflection WAS Moderate, AND DID NOT Be grateful for Breach THAN THEY DID. "IN Discourteous, THE Animal MAKES IT A Accepted OF Maleness THAT THE MAN Prerequisite BE Disdainful TO HERSELF Mentally, THAT SHE Prerequisite BE Influenced AND Taken BY THE MAN; AND THIS IN ITSELF IS A load TO Shush ALL Stuff OF SEXUAL Resemblance." -- Otto Weininger, Sex and Central character, Male and Feminine Natural world
New-fangled READING:
Pook #40 - Do Girls Like Sovereignty?
